ICE After the Midterms: DHS Vows Deportations Will Continue as Democrats Ready Subpoenas

DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin says deportations will continue, while incoming Democratic committee leaders warn ICE and DHS officials to expect subpoenas next year.

Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin answered the Democratic midterm sweep on Wednesday with a three-word social media post, “Deportations will continue,” as incoming Democratic committee leaders told immigration enforcement officials to prepare for subpoenas once the new Congress is seated. The exchange sharpens the fight we laid out when we asked, as reported earlier, whether ICE could be abolished: abolition remains out of reach on current numbers, but oversight of the agency is now clearly where the next two years will be fought.

What changed since election night

Three sets of statements have moved the story forward since the results came in:

The administration’s answer. Mullin posted “Deportations will continue” on X on Nov. 4, a day after Republicans lost both chambers, Right Side Broadcasting Network reported. The post signals that DHS does not plan to scale back enforcement before the new Congress takes over in January.
Subpoena warnings. Several Democrats warned administration officials they would be summoned before committees once the party controls both chambers, Newsweek reported. Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), who is poised to lead the House Oversight Committee, posted “LAWYER UP” on election night. Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.), the sponsor of the abolition bill discussed in our earlier article, named Mullin, former DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, border czar Tom Homan, former Border Patrol official Gregory Bovino and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, telling them to “clear your schedule.”
New abolition voices in the Senate. Two Democratic senators-elect used election-night remarks to call for ending ICE, Daily Kos reported: Minnesota’s Peggy Flanagan said Democrats would “rip ICE apart” and replace it with a system grounded in public safety, and Maine’s Troy Jackson said he would fight to abolish the agency.

The White House pushed back. Spokesperson Lauren Bis told Newsweek the president is willing to work with anyone, but that Democrats who pursue “sham investigations” would be working against the American people.

Why oversight, not abolition, is the realistic battleground

The new statements do not change the legal math. Abolishing ICE still requires a statute that must clear a 60-vote Senate threshold and survive a presidential veto, and two additional abolition supporters in the Senate do not close that gap. Much of ICE’s enforcement money is also already appropriated on a multi-year basis, a point RSBN noted in reporting on Mullin’s post and one we covered in our analysis of the Democratic agenda’s funding limits.

Committee power works differently. A majority controls the gavel, sets hearing agendas and can issue subpoenas for testimony and documents without the president’s signature. Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), the top Democrat on the House Homeland Security Committee, is seeking the chairmanship and has indicated the committee would scrutinize immigration enforcement policies and DHS’s use of federal resources, RSBN reported, citing Politico. Subpoenas can be resisted and litigated, so they do not guarantee quick answers, but they shift the burden onto the agency to respond.

What it means for immigrants with pending cases

Mullin’s post is a reminder that nothing about enforcement changes on its own after an election. The current Congress sits until Jan. 3, 2027, and ICE’s arrest, detention and removal authority is unchanged. People with check-ins, bond conditions, ankle monitors or removal orders should continue to meet every obligation; a missed appointment can lead to arrest or an in-absentia order.

Over time, hearings and document demands could surface information about detention conditions, arrest practices and enforcement targets that becomes useful in individual cases and in litigation. For now, as recent rulings on re-detention without a bond hearing in Colorado show, federal courts remain the faster route to relief for individuals. For the administration’s separate signals on a possible legislative deal, see our report on Trump ruling out amnesty while floating talks with Democrats.

What to watch

Committee assignments: Whether Garcia and Thompson formally take the Oversight and Homeland Security gavels when the new Congress organizes in January.
First subpoenas: Which DHS and ICE officials, and which records, are targeted first, and whether the administration resists.
Dec. 11 funding deadline: The outgoing Congress must act on government funding, an early test of whether Democrats press ICE conditions before taking control.
Abolition bills: Whether the Reimagining Safety Act or similar bills are refiled in the new Congress and whether House leaders allow a floor vote.
Enforcement pace: Whether arrest and removal activity changes in the weeks before the transition, after Mullin’s pledge.

This article is for general information and is not legal advice.

Sources

Vasanth Vaidyanathan, Esq.

Administrator

Vasanth Vaidyanathan is an immigration attorney with over 20 years of experience focused exclusively on U.S. immigration and nationality law. He holds an LL.M. from California Western School of Law, San Diego and advises individuals and businesses on employment and family-based immigration matters, including H-1B, PERM, EB categories, and adjustment of status. He has also been a featured speaker at immigration seminars across the U.S. To reach Vasanth visit: https://www.vnathan.com/

Author's website Author's posts