If you are applying for a green card and receive a notice for an I-485 adjustment of status interview, you might wonder whether your immigration attorney can represent you remotely. This question is especially relevant if your attorney is based in another city or state and cannot travel to the interview location. Here’s what you need to know.
In-Person Representation Is the Rule but in some instances officers oblige remote representation
While telephonic or video representation was temporarily allowed during the COVID-19 pandemic for certain asylum and NACARA interviews, that flexibility was officially rescinded in 2023. I-485 interviews are not eligible for remote representation under existing rules. USCIS policy currently requires that attorneys who wish to attend I-485 interviews must appear in person at the field office conducting the interview. The USCIS Policy Manual makes it clear that all adjustment-of-status applicants must be interviewed in person, unless the interview is waived.
That said, in practice many USCIS officers allow attorneys to participate via phone by way of client calling the Attorney over the phone. So there are always reports of individual officers permitting attorneys to participate via speakerphone if a Form G-28 is already on file. This is done on an informal basis and there are no official video links that USCIS will share with the Attorney.
However, this is not a formal policy and is entirely at the discretion of the interviewing officer. Applicants should not rely on this possibility as a substitute for in-person legal representation. Policy also vary from one field office to the other.
Limited-Scope In-Person Representation Is Allowed
If your primary immigration attorney is located in another city, you can retain a local attorney to attend the interview on a limited-scope basis. It is important that the attorney appearing on a limited basis take the time to familiarize themselves with the client’s file and relevant case history to provide effective representation. This means:
- The local attorney appears in person with you at the interview.
- They may or may not file a new Form G-28.
- If they do file a G-28, it should clearly state that the appearance is limited to the interview only, allowing your original attorney to remain the attorney of record for future filings and correspondence.
In practice, many attorneys simply present a signed G-28 at the interview without filing it with USCIS, making it clear to the officer that the appearance is limited to that day only.
What About Attorney Fees?
If you need to hire a local attorney to attend the interview, fees may vary depending on the attorney’s experience and the complexity of the case. Some attorneys charge a flat fee for interview representation, while others may bill at an hourly rate.
How to Prepare if Your Attorney Cannot Attend
In our experience, most I-485 applicants attend their interviews without an attorney present, and most do not encounter any issues. However, many clients opt to schedule a consultation call to prepare. During these sessions, we review key immigration forms—such as the I-130 petition for family-based applicants, or the PERM application, I-140 petition, and I-485 application for employment-based applicants—and advise clients to familiarize themselves with the information listed in those forms. We also go over personal details that USCIS officers frequently verify, such as prior employment or residence history, marital history, date of birth, and entry and exit records.
If your primary attorney cannot travel for the interview:
- Make sure you are thoroughly prepared in advance with a mock interview.
- Review your I-485 and all supporting documents carefully.
- Follow a checklist and practice answering anticipated questions.
- If you’re working with a local attorney for the interview, ensure they are aligned with your case strategy.
What Role Does the Attorney Play at the Interview?
Many clients wonder what role, if any, an attorney plays during an I-485 interview. While having an attorney present can be reassuring, it’s important to understand that USCIS officers expect to hear directly from the applicant. The attorney may not answer questions on behalf of the client, unless the officer permits them to clarify a legal point or provide brief context. Attorneys can intervene to protect their client’s rights, correct misstatements, or object to inappropriate lines of questioning—but excessive interruptions or attempts to explain routine facts may be frowned upon.
In fact, some USCIS officers prefer a more streamlined interview and may express frustration if an attorney frequently interjects. For this reason, attorneys typically limit their role to ensuring procedural fairness, helping clarify legal matters, and being a quiet advocate during the process.
Bottom Line
In most cases, USCIS does not allow remote attorney participation for I-485 interviews. However, there have been exceptions where officers have permitted attorneys to participate via speakerphone—typically only if requested by the applicant and if a Form G-28 is already on file. These exceptions are discretionary and not part of formal USCIS policy. If your attorney cannot attend in person and you are hoping for telephonic participation, it’s best to contact the field office beforehand to confirm whether such an arrangement is possible. You don’t want to be caught off guard on the day of the interview.
If your attorney is unavailable due to travel or scheduling conflicts, another option is to request a rescheduling of the interview. USCIS generally allows one rescheduling request without issue. This can be helpful if you strongly prefer that your own attorney be present and available.
If you choose to work with a new local attorney, be aware that preparing for the interview will likely take time. A local attorney unfamiliar with your case will need to carefully review the I-485 and supporting petitions (e.g., I-130 or I-140 and PERM, depending on the case), which can take around an hour or more depending on the complexity. Interviews themselves may also be delayed, and what might appear to be a one-hour engagement can easily turn into a four-hour commitment.
Additionally, attorneys charge not only for the interview time, but also for travel time, especially if the USCIS office is not close to their primary office. During this time, they may be missing billable work at their law practice. As a result, fees for limited-scope interview representation can range from $1,000 to $3,000, depending on the attorney and circumstances.
One advantage of having your attorney of record assist in finding a local lawyer is the assurance of quality representation. Many attorneys have a trusted network of immigration lawyers in different cities and can refer you to someone experienced and reliable.
Having an attorney present at the interview can also provide strategic advantages. An experienced immigration lawyer can gauge the strength of your case based on the officer’s line of questioning. If a Request for Evidence (RFE) is issued following the interview, the attorney’s firsthand understanding of what transpired can be valuable in crafting a well-informed and responsive reply.
You can still be accompanied by a local attorney who either files a limited-scope G-28 or appears with authorization from your primary attorney. This approach ensures you have legal support while maintaining consistency in your overall immigration strategy.
About the Author
Discover more from Immigration Analytics
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
